Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods

Publication year: 2012 Source: Journal of Informetrics, Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 36-43 Dag W. Aksnes, Jesper W. Schneider, Magnus Gunnarsson This paper presents an empirical analysis of two different methodologies for calculating national citation indicators: whole counts and fractionalised counts.

Publication year: 2012 Source: Journal of Informetrics, Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 36-43 Dag W. Aksnes, Jesper W. Schneider, Magnus Gunnarsson This paper presents an empirical analysis of two different methodologies for calculating national citation indicators: whole counts and fractionalised counts.

Read the original post:
Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods

Related posts:

  1. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?
  2. Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks
  3. Webometric research with the Bing Search API 2.0
  4. Publication patterns of award-winning forest scientists and implications for the Australian ERA journal ranking
  5. What was wrong with Australia’s journal ranking?
  6. Network analysis of temporal trends in scholarly research productivity
  7. Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: A comparative study of collaborative measures
  8. Separation and purification ofToxoplasma gondiitachyzoites fromin vitroandin vivoculture systems
  9. Multivariate approach to classify research institutes according to their outputs: The case of the CSIC’s institutes
  10. Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing