Closed Chain Kinesiology: More Accurate Than Biomechanics?

Biomechanics research and practice has led to great advances including new terminology, hypotheses and protocols for treating chief complaints that deserve much praise. But in recent years, little high level evidence with clinical significance has surfaced in spite of the effort of many. Perhaps we have focused too much on the “force” pillar and not enough on the “skeletal structure” pillar when experimenting and hypothesizing?

Biomechanics research and practice has led to great advances including new terminology, hypotheses and protocols for treating chief complaints that deserve much praise. But in recent years, little high level evidence with clinical significance has surfaced in spite of the effort of many. Perhaps we have focused too much on the “force” pillar and not enough on the “skeletal structure” pillar when experimenting and hypothesizing?

Excerpt from:
Closed Chain Kinesiology: More Accurate Than Biomechanics?

Related posts:

  1. Functional Foot Type Closed Chain Characteristics
  2. Taping alters ankle biomechanics
  3. Assessing PTTD: Linking the kinetic chain
  4. Is The Podiatry Arena a Positive Force For Biomechanics?
  5. A New Approach to Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Models
  6. Recovery timetable for closed/acute m-3 foot fracture
  7. Closed Total Talar Extrusion After Ankle Sprain
  8. Has ANZPAC closed down?
  9. Vertical Collaboration in the Semiconductor Industry: A Decision Framework for Supply Chain Relationships
  10. Amino acid side chain-like surface modification on magnetic nanoparticles for highly efficient separation of mixed proteins