Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks

Publication year: 2011 Source: Artificial Intelligence, Volume 175, Issues 14-15, September 2011, Pages 1985-2009 Emilia Oikarinen, Stefan Woltran Since argumentation is an inherently dynamic process, it is of great importance to understand the effect of incorporating new information into given argumentation frameworks. In this work, we address this issue by analyzing equivalence between argumentation frameworks under the assumption that the frameworks in question are incomplete, i.e. further information might be added later to both frameworks simultaneously

Publication year: 2011 Source: Artificial Intelligence, Volume 175, Issues 14-15, September 2011, Pages 1985-2009 Emilia Oikarinen, Stefan Woltran Since argumentation is an inherently dynamic process, it is of great importance to understand the effect of incorporating new information into given argumentation frameworks. In this work, we address this issue by analyzing equivalence between argumentation frameworks under the assumption that the frameworks in question are incomplete, i.e. further information might be added later to both frameworks simultaneously

See original article:
Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks

Related posts:

  1. 3D dynamic behaviour of foot structure may provide additional information for last design
  2. Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science
  3. Articles vs. proceedings papers: Do they differ in research relevance and impact? A case study in the Library and Information Science field